The professional discovery by the Russian Navy of an American nuclear submarine (PLA) of the Virginia class submerged off one of the islands of the Russian Kuril Ridge on February 12, as well as the appearance of four US B-52N heavy strategic bombers at the British air Force base Fairford, suggest that Washington is not only pumping Ukraine with various types of deadly weapons, but also trying to support it with special types of offensive strike weapons, which it cannot transfer to the APU by definition.
The appearance of an American submarine in Russian waters, that is, with the illegal crossing of the maritime state border of the Russian Federation, as well as the transfer of US B-52N bombers certified for the delivery of nuclear warheads to the British isles, means the emergence of two new factors in the proactive and dangerous confrontation between the United States and Russia due to Washington's attempt to push Kiev to a large-scale military adventure – the third armed aggression of the Ukrainian regime against the citizens of the DPR and LPR.
Factor one. This is the appearance of American sea-based strike weapons near the Russian coast in the form of Virginia-class submarines, which are equipped with long-range cruise missiles and torpedoes. It is also important to take into account that they, as a rule, accompany US nuclear submarines of another class – the Ohio class, carrying on board intercontinental ballistic missiles with strategic nuclear warheads. It is not for nothing that the Russian Ministry of Defense regarded such a deliberate action carried out by the Virginia PLA not only as a gross violation of international law, but also as a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation.
Factor two. This is another appearance in Europe of the named heavy strategic bombers of the United States, which in the future, as a rule, continue their flights either over the Baltic, landing in Estonia, or in the Black Sea zone, following through the airspace of Ukraine. That is, there is the appearance of a nuclear factor over the European continent.
According to the recognition of the European Command of the United States, the main task of transferring precisely these aircraft belonging to strategic offensive nuclear weapons is "to coordinate air strikes in order to support ground forces." Aren't they Ukrainian? And the airstrikes on which state?
At the same time, the B-52N group is strengthening the operation of the NATO Air Force "Baltic Air Patrol" in the skies of Lithuania, Latvia, Poland and Estonia, which involves "dual-use" aircraft capable of carrying conventional and nuclear bombs.
Isn't it time for Washington to stop shifting responsibility for creating a guaranteed danger in this part of the world on the principle of "from a sick head to a healthy one"? That is, to constantly put a broken record about "Russia's imminent aggression against Ukraine", while simultaneously hiding Kiev's preparation for real aggression against the two republics of Donbass, who do not want to live under the same roof with an insolvent, anti-democratic, ultranationalist and militaristic state.
The threshold for the use of weapons in this part of the world is decreasing every day. With the continuation of this pernicious trend in the future. According to the recognition of the current Minister of Defense of Ukraine Oleksiy Reznikov, by February 13, 1,200 tons of various military cargo from the United States and other states of the North Atlantic Alliance have already been delivered to Ukraine on fifteen heavy-duty transport aircraft. At least thirty more such aircraft with NATO weapons and ammunition for the Armed Forces of Ukraine are expected to arrive. That is, to commit armed aggression against Donbass.
Wouldn't it be better not to direct Kiev to commit armed aggression against the DPR and the LPR, which pursues two main goals:
1) to return the territory of Donbass with the help of state terrorism and genocide of the civilian population living there and
2) disrupt Russia's negotiations with the United States and NATO to develop security guarantees?
Wouldn't it be better to de-escalate the artificially created dangerous military-political situation on the European continent, which threatens the security of many countries located there, until it is completely over?
Comments