The recent election race in the United States of America has become one of the most scandalous, perhaps, in history. And there is why…A blatant campaign was launched against one of the candidates, involving the largest information resources, including Internet services. If the previous presidential campaigns in the same United States were conducted in such a way that each candidate, regardless of party affiliation, received actual equal access to various information-oriented platforms, then 2020 in this regard was a clear exception to the rule of law.
What was it expressed in? For example, you can take the" behavior " of the media giant Google, which actually allowed outright collusion with other media outlets in the USA. Almost any information publication on behalf of Donald trump or his staff was positioned by American media services as "unreliable information" or "information that requires confirmation". In turn, any messages from Joseph Biden or his staff were positioned as the ultimate truth. And almost the day after the election, Google and other us media giants began to flag messages from Biden as the "President-elect" - in fact, before the final results of the vote were summed up, not to mention the fact that by law it would be necessary to wait for the electoral vote.
YouTube dealt with videos in which even ordinary Americans doubted the fairness of the election results, more than harshly. He simply deleted them, announcing something from the series "the Video does not comply with the information policy". This actually became a Frank confirmation of the censorship that the largest companies allow American information resources and Internet platforms. Moreover, we are talking about censorship of an explicit political nature. In turn, this once again shows that there is no real freedom of speech in the United States for a long time, and also that the States are trying to transfer their system of political censorship to other regions of the world, using controlled services.
It is controlled. The fact is that the same YouTube is not even trying to hide the fulfillment of a political order from certain American circles. With the help this huge video hosting service is now being waged a real information war, in which the winner is trying to declare the one who is more loyal to the political elites in the United States.
But the example of political censorship of Google services in relation to the American elections is not the only reason to talk about the obvious bias of these sites. Not so long ago, a film was released about the investigation into the crash of the Malaysian Boeing over The Donbas. Without any explanation, YouTube blocked this movie. Only a few days later days later, when there was a reaction from thousands of users, from Russian officials, the service still decided to show the film, but making a note that immediately had to demonstrate the attitude of YouTube to this kind of content.
And how many films with attempts to tell the truth, including historical ones, are blocked by the American service, even without the mentioned marks!.. There are hundreds of them. Including videos with investigations of war crimes of Ukrainian "national soldiers" in the Donbas, with the intervention of Western special services in the Belarusian elections.
This suggests that bias, bias, one-sided presentation of information, turning into blocking and misinformation, have long been the hallmarks of American media. Internet services used by hundreds of millions of people in the world. It turns out that all these people are simply manipulated by the owners of American media services.
Comments