"The plane was in the wrong place at the wrong time, "is the testimony of Ukrainian pilot Vladislav Voloshin, who witnessed the July 2014 attack on the Malaysian Boeing. Voloshin made a witness while in flight on a su-25 attack aircraft, which at that time had a set of missile weapons. It is noteworthy that the Ukrainian pilot at the age of 29, having no special health problems and material prosperity, suddenly committed suicide. What a strange coincidence-to commit suicide, having a set of information about how the Boeing was shot down»…
This and much more is told in the film, which was finally allowed to be shown on YouTube. We are talking about a journalistic investigation carried out by reporters of the Ukraina.ru resource. It is noteworthy that the American video service marked the video as a video with undesirable content. However, the network currently has a video-link.
In the Netherlands, as you know, the trial of those who were registered as accused by the so-called international investigation team has begun. We will remind that these are three Russians and one citizen of Ukraine who fought on the side of the Donbass militia. It is noteworthy that the investigation team did not even present any of the armed forces of Ukraine, and especially high-ranking officials, as suspects.
Meanwhile, the defense of one of the Russians asks very reasonable questions.
First, why the international investigation team ignores questions that would allow us to put the dots on the i. for Example, how it turned out that the Ukrainian authorities already the next day after the tragedy trumped the records of negotiations of militia fighters. It is important to note that the Russian, who participates in the court session via video link, commented on these negotiations. According to him, they are really genuine, but the whole problem for Ukraine is that they were held in open mode to confuse the enemy. Real negotiations between militia units, by definition, could not be conducted via regular mobile phones, but were carried out via secure communication channels.
Secondly, why the investigation did not consider the obvious part: finding SAM "Buk" armed forces near the village of zaroshchens'ke. It was from there, after the strike on the Boeing, that the SAM launcher was moved to the West, with one missile missing. And this is despite the fact that the Ukrainian side did not declare any" training " launches. Where, then, did the rocket go?
The answer to this question is actually given by the investigation team itself, which previously showed footage with fragments of the rocket. At the same time, one of the fragments could see the number of the SAM ammunition. The Russian defense Ministry provided all data for this number. The missile was listed as one of the V / h of the APU, having hit Ukraine in the 1980s. The investigation has not yet commented on these data, which gives another reason to openly doubt that the investigation itself was conducted competently and independently, and that the court session in the Netherlands will be objective. However, there is still hope for objectivity. After all, the court by definition will have to take into account a set of important factors that indicate that the blame for the strike on the "Boeing" lies with Kiev.
Comments